Ingredient Dictionary/octocrylene/OCTOCRYLENE
Tier 1 Monograph · SSOT 15 FieldsRaw .md (GEO) ↗
Synthetic

OCTOCRYLENE

UV FilterLight Stabilizer
[EU CosIng Official Definition] Octocrylene is the substituted acrylate that conforms to the formula
Executive Regulatory & Safety Fact BoxAEO / GEO CITATION ANCHOR

What is OCTOCRYLENE (CAS 6197-30-4) in cosmetics and what are its global regulatory limits?

OCTOCRYLENE (CAS No. 6197-30-4) is a verified cosmetic ingredient primarily functioning as UV Filter, Light Stabilizer in topical formulations. Regulated under KR MFDS (Restricted) and EU 1223/2009 CosIng (Restricted) statutory frameworks, it is typically formulated at 2–10% within an optimal stability window of pH 4–8.

7-Track Official Regulatory Label Names Matrix

Primary Statutory Gazette Only · Zero Machine Translation
7-Track Official Statutory Label Names for OCTOCRYLENE
Jurisdiction TrackOfficial Statutory Label NameOne-Click Copy
1. Korea (MFDS Standard Name)OCTOCRYLENE (KR MFDS Registered)
2. Korea Former Nomenclature History——
3. European Union (EU CosIng Glossary)OCTOCRYLENE
4. United States (US PCPC / MoCRA INCI)OCTOCRYLENE
5. US FDA OTC Monograph Active NameOCTOCRYLENE
6. China (NMPA IECIC Standard Name)奥克立林
7. Japan (JCIA Standard / MHLW Quasi-Drug)OCTOCRYLENE (Standard INCI Reference)

Layer 1 — Statutory Regulatory Limits Across 6 Regions

Layer 1 Statutory Regulatory Limits Across 6 Regions for OCTOCRYLENE
RegionStatusMax LimitConditions & Statutory Source
Korea (MFDS)Restricted≤ 10%
Permitted within statutory scope
Source: ( API · [2])
Europe (EU)Restricted≤ 10%
Permitted within statutory scope
Source: Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 Annex VI — via CosIng (EU Commission)
China (NMPA)Restricted≤ 10%
Permitted within statutory scope
Source: 化妆品安全技术规范(2015 Ed.) — 表5
China (NMPA)Restricted≤ 10%
Permitted within statutory scope
Source: 化妆品安全技术规范(2015年版)
United States (FDA)Restricted≤ 10%
[US RESTRICTED] * 【Restrictions】 Maximum Concentration (제한) : 10% * Specific Limitations and Comments : Use of the term "sunscreen" or similar sun protection wording in a product's labeling generally causes the product to be subject to regulation as a drug or a drug/cosmetic, depending on the claims. However, sunscreen ingredients may also be used in some cosmetic products to protect the products’ color. The labelling must also state why the sunscreen ingredient is used, for example, "Contains a sunscreen to protect product color." If this explanation isn’t present, the product may be subject to regulation as a drug (21 CFR 700.35). For more information on sunscreens, refer to Tanning Products * 특별 제한조건 : "선스크린"의 단어를 사용하거나 자외선 차단과 비슷한 단어를 사용할 경우, 해당 제품은 클레임(표시광고)에 따라 제약 또는 제약/화장품의 규정을 따라야 한다. ^그러나, 자외선 차단의 성분들은 제품의 색을 보호하는 역할로 사용되기도 한다. 자외선을 차단하는 성분이 사용된 목적에 대해 라벨링에 반드시 명시해야한다. 예를 들어, "제품의 색을 보호하기 위해 자외차단제 성분을 함유하고 있다." ^만약 이러한 설명을 라벨링에 하지 않는다면, 그 상품은 제약으로서의 규정에 따라야한다. (21 CFR 700.35) ^자외선 차단에 대한 정보가 궁금하면 태닝 제품을 참고하라.
Source: API ()
Korea (MFDS)Labelling / Claim≤ 10%
Permitted within statutory scope
Source: MFDS Functional Cosmetics Notice [Annex 4]
Interactive Quartile Box-Plot (Min–Q1–Median–Q3–Max)

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Box-Plot vs. Statutory Limit

Statutory Max: 10%
Sunscreen / Colorn=33
Min 2% · Q1 3% · Median 4% · Q3 6% · Max 10%
Sunscreen / Color — Sun care & color cosmetics dispersion / sensory modifier
Verified Source: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=33, EVONIK 14 · GRANT 13 · SEPPIC 6) (cir_safety) · EVONIK 14 · GRANT 13 · SEPPIC 6
Typical Median: 4%

Layer 3 — Formulation Usage Guide (Quartiles n≥5) & Physicochemical Compatibility

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Quartiles by Product Category for OCTOCRYLENE
Formulation GroupMin – Q1 – Median – Q3 – Max (%)Role & MechanismSource ID
Group D — Sunscreen (UV) / Color Cosmetics / Foundation2% · 3% · 4% · 6% · 10%Sun care & color cosmetics dispersion / sensory modifierGlobal Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=33, EVONIK 14 · GRANT 13 · SEPPIC 6)
Cutaneous Permeation Science (500 Dalton Rule)MW: Macro/Complex · LogP: N/A

Stratum Corneum Penetration Depth & Bio-Spicule Transdermal Delivery

Stratum Corneum (Brick & Mortar Barrier · 10–20 µm)500 Da Molecular Weight Cutoff BarrierViable Epidermis (Keratinocytes & Melanocytes · 50–100 µm)Target for Brightening (Tyrosinase/Melanosome) & Barrier LipidsPapillary Dermis (Fibroblasts & ECM Collagen · 150–300 µm)Target for Collagen I/III Synthesis, Peptides, PDRN & ExosomesEpidermal Passive Permeation (<500 Da)
Molecular Weight & LogP Permeation Diagnosis
Low Molecular Weight (320 Da ≤ 500 Da) — Passive Permeation Feasible

Under passive topical application, molecules diffuse tortuously through intercellular lipids. Hydrophilic compounds >500 Da remain primarily on the outer stratum corneum.

Estimated Target Depth
40–90 µm
Optimal Delivery System
Polyol Enhancer / Serum
Colloid Interface, pH Spectrum & Thermal Stability

pH Stability Window (0–14), Thermal Limit & HLB Colloidal Phase Behavior

Water or glycol phase soluble/dispersible
Optimal Formulation pH Stability Window (0–14)pH 4.0 – 8.0
0245.5791114

Outside pH 4–8, risk of hydrolysis, viscosity loss, or ionic dissociation increases.

Maximum Thermal Processing Limit (°C)≤ 50°C
25°C45°C60°C75°C85°C100°C

Thermally stable up to 50°C during standard emulsification.

HLB Scale (0–20) & Colloidal Micelle / Lamellar Phase Simulator
O/W Oil-in-Water Micelle Emulsion (Lotion / Cream)
HLB 11.5
W/O (3–6)Lamellar (8–10.5)O/W Emulsion (11–15)Solubilizer (15–19)O/W Droplet
Biochemical Signaling & Mechanism Pathway

Cellular & Molecular Target Mechanism Flow

1. Epidermal Interaction→ Upregulation / Activation
Intercellular Lipid & Hydration Matrix
→
TEWL Reduction & Barrier Conditioning
2. Homeostasis Modulation⊣ Inhibition / Blockade
Oxidative Stress (ROS) & Irritant Cascade
⊣
Cutaneous Soothing & Homeostasis
Formulation Ontology Radial Graph

Interactive Synergy Pairings (Solid) & Incompatibility Warnings (Dashed)

+ GLYCERIN+ CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TR…+ TOCOPHEROL✕ Verify phase compati…OCTOCRYLENE
Interactive Node Guide

Click any green synergy node to jump directly to its monograph, or click a red dashed node to inspect the chemical incompatibility mechanism.

Nominative Trade Name References (Trademark Act Art. 90(1)(2))
OCTOCRYLENE

Trade names are provided strictly for descriptive identification of polymer/emulsifier grades under Article 90(1)(2) of the Trademark Act. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.

Academic & Toxicological Synthesis

Tier 1 Synthesis

Synthesized strictly from peer-reviewed PubMed abstracts and official toxicological dossiers linked to this ingredient.

■ [1. Chemical Identity & International Labeling Nomenclature] - INCI Name: OCTOCRYLENE | CAS No.: 6197-30-4 | EC No.: 228-250-8 - Origin: SYNTHETIC | Functions: , - Physicochemical Profile: Formula | MW /(Polymer/Complex) | / | Ionic Nature: non-ionic | CosIng/MFDS - Official Regional Label Names: US [OCTOCRYLENE] · EU [OCTOCRYLENE] · CN [奥克立林] · JP [-] · JP Quasi-Drug [-] ■ [2. Dermatological Mechanism of Action & Functional Role] - Octocrylene is the substituted acrylate that conforms to the formula Classified under origin 'synthetic', it acts within the cosmetic vehicle or stratum corneum to deliver , performance and structural formulation stability. ■ [3. Global 6-Jurisdiction Regulatory Status & Safety Limits (Layer 1 & Layer 2)] - Regional Summary: KR: RESTRICTED | EU: RESTRICTED | US: RESTRICTED | CN: RESTRICTED | JP: NONE | ASEAN: NONE (CN IECIC (2025) Entry No. 1062 (奥克立林)) - [CN / COMPOSITION / limited] (Max 10%): - [CN / COMPOSITION / limited] (Max 10%): - [KR / COMPOSITION / limited] (Max 10%): - Official Safety & Historical Use Concentration (Layer 2): Quantum satis (QS) within standard cosmetic safety margins ■ [4. Formulation Dosage Guide by Product Category (Layer 3-A)] - [sun_color] Typical range: 2.0 ~ 10.0% (Median 4.0%, Ref: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=33, EVONIK 14 · GRANT 13 · SEPPIC 6)) — Sun care & color cosmetics dispersion / sensory modifier ■ [5. Formulation Engineering, Stability & Incompatibility Matrix (Layer 3-B)] - Addition Phase: Water Phase or Cool-down Phase (< 45°C) - Optimal pH Range: pH 4.0 ~ 8.0 | Max Process Temp: Max 50°C | Electrolyte Tolerance: MEDIUM - Incompatibility / Caution: Verify phase compatibility under extreme pH or high electrolyte loads - Synergy Pairings: GLYCERIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHEROL | Reference Trade Names: OCTOCRYLENE ■ [6. Peer-Reviewed Literature & Official Compendia Evidence] - PMID 31588614 (2019, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol): Review of the safety of octocrylene used as an ultraviolet filter in cosmetics. - PMID 42167390 (2026, Environ Toxicol Pharmacol): UV-protective agents threaten bivalve reproduction: Impacts of octocrylene and benzophenone on gamete quality and fertil - PMID 41985167 (2026, Cutan Ocul Toxicol): Leveraging a TRPV1-overexpressing cell model: an integrated testing strategy for UV filter-induced ocular irritation

Linked Peer-Reviewed Literature (NIH PubMed) (13)

Review of the safety of octocrylene used as an ultraviolet filter in cosmetics. [PMID: 31588614 · 2019]
Berardesca E, Zuberbier T, Sanchez Viera M, Marinovich M · J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (2019)

Octocrylene or octocrilene is an organic ultraviolet (UV) filter which absorbs mainly UVB radiation and short UVA wavelengths. It is used in various cosmetic products to either provide an appropriate sun protection factor in sunscreen products or to protect cosmetic formulations from UV radiation. There is no discussion that UV filters are beneficial ingredients in cosmetics since they protect from skin cancer, but octocrylene has been recently incriminated to potentially induce adverse effects on the endocrine system in addition to having allergic and/or photoallergic potential. However, the substance has the advantage to work synergistically with other filters allowing a beneficial broad photoprotection, e.g. it stabilizes the UVA filter avobenzone (i.e. butylmethoxydibenzoylmethane). Like all chemicals used in cosmetics, the safety profile of octocrylene is constantly under assessment by the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) since it has been registered according to the European regulation Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals. Summaries of safety data of octocrylene are publicly available on the ECHA website. This review aims to present the main safety data from the ECHA website, as well as those reported in scientific articles from peer-reviewed journals. The available data show that octocrylene does not have any endocrine disruption potential. It is a rare sensitizer, photocontact allergy is more frequent and it is considered consecutive to photosensitization to ketoprofen. Based on these results, octocrylene can be considered as safe when used as a UV filter in cosmetic products at a concentration up to 10%.

UV-protective agents threaten bivalve reproduction: Impacts of octocrylene and benzophenone on gamete quality and fertilization in the Pacific oyster (Magallana gigas) [PMID: 42167390 · 2026]
Carvalhais A, Lippa R, Oliveira IB, Pacheco M, Mieiro C · Environ Toxicol Pharmacol (2026)

Gamete quality is crucial to the reproductive success of marine broadcast spawners, as environmental stressors can disrupt their structure and function. This study investigates the effects of the organic UV-protective agents octocrylene (OC) and benzophenone (BP), following ex vivo exposure (1, 10, 100&#x202f;&#xb5;g.L -1 ), on the oxidative balance, DNA integrity, and fertilization success of Pacific oyster (Magallana gigas) gametes. OC and BP induced spermiotoxicity via DNA damage without affecting acrosome integrity or redox status, while oocyte redox status and energy profile were unchanged. Nevertheless, fertilization decreased across all treatments when oocytes or sperm were exposed individually, and at the highest concentrations when both gametes were exposed. A 10-30% drop in fertilization proved sensitive for detecting impairment. Overall, low OC and BP levels reduce oyster fertilization through effects not captured by standard biochemical biomarkers, supporting fertilization success as an integrative, sensitive endpoint of gamete function.

Leveraging a TRPV1-overexpressing cell model: an integrated testing strategy for UV filter-induced ocular irritation [PMID: 41985167 · 2026]
Zhang T, Sun F, Liu Y, Zhuang B, Chang J, Deng X, Cheng S · Cutan Ocul Toxicol (2026)

Eye discomfort is a common issue for consumers using sunscreen products. While UV filters are suspected of being the main cause, no clear scientific evidence has been found to support this hypothesis. This research aims to develop a scientifically effective eye irritation screening method to provide a scientific explanation for the eye discomfort caused by UV filters. In order to assess the ocular irritation of two UV filters, Octocrylene (OCT) and Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (OMC), a combination of in silico and in vitro methods was employed. In silico prediction was conducted using seven computational ADMET prediction models (e.g. AdmetSAR 3.0, ADMETlab 2.0). The i n vitro experimental validation included Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) and Short Time Exposure (STE) assays, and TRPV1 ion channel activation was probed using TRPV1-overexpressing rabbit corneal epithelial cells (TRPV1-OE SIRC cells). Different in silico toxicology prediction models did not yield consistent results regarding the eye irritation potential of the two UV filters. The results of the BCOP and STE tests showed that both UV filters were nonirritating. Detection of TRPV1 channel activation indicated that OCT can induce Ca 2+ influx in cells, resulting in ocular discomfort, while OMC did not. These results indicated that this in vitro screening method based on the activation of the TRPV1 channel is more sensitive in detecting stinging sensations in the eyes. This mechanism may provide a possible explanation for UV filter-induced eye discomfort and has potential for screening other cosmetic ingredients that cause such discomfort without irritation.

In Silico Perspective on Avobenzone, Octisalate, Octocrylene, Homosalate, and Bemotrizinol as Organic UV Filters Using DFT, TD-DFT, and Molecular Dynamics [PMID: 41726609 · 2026]
Rigoni ME, de Lazaro SR, de Lara LS · ACS Omega (2026)

Ultraviolet radiation is the leading cause of skin damage, such as burns, premature aging, and the development of skin cancer. Organic sunscreens are widely used in the cosmetics industry due to their ability to absorb ultraviolet radiation and dissipate it as heat. These compounds can be susceptible to photochemical instability, which compromises their effectiveness over time and also poses environmental risks, particularly in aquatic ecosystems. This study investigated the electronic properties, absorption spectra, and solvent effects of five widely used organic UV filters: Avobenzone, Homosalate, Octisalate, Octocrylene, and Bemotrizinol. The analyses were performed through DFT and TD-DFT calculations. Solvent effects were evaluated using an implicit solvent model and complemented by molecular dynamics simulations in an aqueous environment.

Probabilistic emissions model for organic UV filters released to recreational waters during swimming/bathing events [PMID: 41712751 · 2026]
Federle TW, Fleming ML, Davies IA, Versteeg DJ · Environ Toxicol Chem (2026)

A critical element for understanding measured concentrations and predicting exposure levels of UV filters (UVFs) in recreational waters relates to mass released from sunscreen products applied to skin during swimming and bathing. A probabilistic mass transfer kinetic model was developed to estimate distributions of the mass of five organic UVFs released during individual swim events with sunscreen. The model incorporates the ratios of different demographics and distributions of their total skin areas, adjusted to account for body areas to which sunscreens are not typically applied or do not contact water. The resulting distribution of skin areas is combined with distributions of sunscreen application rates and UVF levels in sunscreen products to generate a distribution of UVF masses on skin that are exposed to water with the fraction released to water calculated using a first-order equation describing the kinetics of release. The predicted median mass released during a swim event was 112&#x2009;mg for oxybenzone, 32.6&#x2009;mg for avobenzone, 23.5&#x2009;mg for octocrylene, 47.7&#x2009;mg for homosalate, and 7.59&#x2009;mg for octisalate. As proof of principle, the model was used to repeat previous modeling at Proph&#xe8;te Beach, which resulted in predicted median values for oxybenzone and avobenzone within a factor of three of the reported measured environmental concentrations.

Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Personal Care Products: A Focus on Established and Emerging Allergens [PMID: 42309282 · 2026]
Smale NE, Karagounis TK, Milam EC, et al. · J Am Acad Dermatol (2026)

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to personal care products (PCPs) represents a significant and growing clinical challenge, with increasing use of diverse PCPs and their expanding range of ingredients. Common allergenic components include fragrances, botanicals, preservatives, surfactants, emollients, emulsifiers, vitamins, and ultraviolet filters. Patch testing remains the gold standard for diagnosing ACD and identifying causative allergens, but traditional panels often fail to capture emerging PCP-related allergens. This review highlights key established and emerging PCP allergens, such as limonene and linalool hydroperoxides, sodium benzoate, octocrylene, and benzophenone-4. Strategies are discussed to optimize diagnostic accuracy through targeted series and repeated open application tests. Patient education about PCP labeling is paramount when assisting patients with allergen avoidance. Clinicians must balance precise allergen identification with practical management knowledge to improve outcomes in PCP-related ACD.

Determination of 16 organic ultraviolet absorbers in drinking water by solid phase extraction-ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [PMID: 42246099 · 2026]
Wang Z, Zhao C, Ye BX, et al. · Se Pu (2026)

Organic ultraviolet absorbers &#xff08;OUVAs&#xff09; are a class of emerging contaminants that have garnered significant attention in recent years. In response to the characteristics of high detection frequency and low concentrations of OUVAs in water bodies&#xff0c; this study established an analytical method based on solid phase extraction &#xff08;SPE&#xff09; coupled with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry &#xff08;UHPLC-MS/MS&#xff09; for the simultaneous determination of 16 OUVAs &#xff08;nine UV stabilizers and seven UV filters&#xff09; in drinking water. The 500 mL water sample was pretreated with 25 mg ascorbic acid&#xff0c; acidified to pH 2-3&#xff0c; and spiked with 1 mL of 5 &#x3bc;g/L mixed internal standard working solution. Target compounds were enriched and concentrated using an HLB solid phase extraction cartridge &#xff08;200 mg/6 mL&#xff09;. Separation was achieved on an Acquity Premier BEH C 18 column &#xff08;100 mm&#xd7;2.1 mm&#xff0c; 1.7 &#x3bc;m&#xff09; using a gradient elution with methanol and 2 mmol/L ammonium acetate aqueous solution as the mobile phases. Detection was performed using electrospray ionization in positive mode and multiple reaction monitoring &#xff08;MRM&#xff09;&#xff0c; with quantification carried out by the internal standard method. The precision and accuracy of the established method were evaluated using drinking water as the matrix. The results showed that all 16 OUVAs exhibited good linearity within their respective mass concentration ranges&#xff0c; with correlation coefficients &#xff08; r &#xff09; greater than 0.992. The method detection limits &#xff08;MDL&#xff0c; S/N= 3&#xff09; were 0.03-5 ng/L&#xff0c; and the method quantification limits &#xff08;MQL&#xff0c; S/N= 10&#xff09; were 0.1-15 ng/L. At spiked levels of 5&#xff0c; 20 and 50 ng/L&#xff0c; the recoveries of the target analytes ranged from 75.0% to 130.6%&#xff0c; with relative standard deviations &#xff08;RSDs&#xff09; ranging from 0.9% to 12.9% &#xff08; n =6&#xff09;. A total of seven source water samples and seven drinking water samples were analyzed using this method. The results showed that two OUVAs&#xff0c; 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone &#xff08;UV-9&#xff09; and octocrylene &#xff08;OC&#xff09; were detected. In source water&#xff0c; the mass concentrations of UV-9 ranged from &lt;MQL to 13.4 ng/L&#xff0c; while OC mass concentrations ranged from 5.0 to 32.23 ng/L. In drinking water&#xff0c; UV-9 was detected at 0.4 ng/L&#xff0c; and OC mass concentrations ranged from &lt;MQL to 13.2 ng/L. This method is suitable for the trace analysis of 16 OUVAs in drinking water&#xff0c; demonstrating good accuracy and precision. It effectively improves the detection efficiency of OUVAs in water and can be used for the environmental monitoring and analysis of OUVAs in drinking water in China. &#x6709;&#x673a;&#x7d2b;&#x5916;&#x5438;&#x6536;&#x5242;&#xff08;OUVAs&#xff09;&#x662f;&#x4e00;&#x7c7b;&#x8fd1;&#x5e74;&#x6765;&#x5907;&#x53d7;&#x5173;&#x6ce8;&#x7684;&#x65b0;&#x6c61;&#x67d3;&#x7269;&#x3002;&#x672c;&#x7814;&#x7a76;&#x9488;&#x5bf9;&#x6c34;&#x4f53;&#x4e2d;OUVAs&#x68c0;&#x51fa;&#x7387;&#x9ad8;&#x4e14;&#x542b;&#x91cf;&#x4f4e;&#x7684;&#x7279;&#x70b9;&#xff0c;&#x5efa;&#x7acb;&#x4e86;&#x4e00;&#x79cd;&#x57fa;&#x4e8e;&#x56fa;&#x76f8;&#x8403;&#x53d6;-&#x8d85;&#x9ad8;&#x6548;&#x6db2;&#x76f8;&#x8272;&#x8c31;-&#x4e32;&#x8054;&#x8d28;&#x8c31;&#x540c;&#x65f6;&#x68c0;&#x6d4b;&#x751f;&#x6d3b;&#x996e;&#x7528;&#x6c34;&#x4e2d;9&#x79cd;&#x7d2b;&#x5916;&#x7a33;&#x5b9a;&#x5242;&#x4e0e;7&#x79cd;&#x7d2b;&#x5916;&#x8fc7;&#x6ee4;&#x5242;&#x7684;&#x5206;&#x6790;&#x65b9;&#x6cd5;&#x3002;&#x5728;500 mL&#x6c34;&#x6837;&#x4e2d;&#x5148;&#x52a0;&#x5165;25 mg&#x6297;&#x574f;&#x8840;&#x9178;&#xff0c;&#x7136;&#x540e;&#x52a0;&#x5165;&#x76d0;&#x9178;&#x5c06;pH&#x8c03;&#x81f3;2~3&#xff0c;&#x518d;&#x52a0;&#x5165;1 mL 5 &#x3bc;g/L&#x7684;&#x6df7;&#x5408;&#x5185;&#x6807;&#x5de5;&#x4f5c;&#x6db2;&#xff0c;&#x7528;HLB&#x56fa;&#x76f8;&#x8403;&#x53d6;&#x67f1;&#xff08;200

Organic Sunscreens-Biological Activity from an Enzymatic Perspective [PMID: 42197211 · 2026]
Sobańska AW, Sobański AM, Brzezińska E · Molecules (2026)

Selected organic sunscreens from different chemical families were investigated in the context of their ability to inhibit butyrylcholinesterase using novel Multiple Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Regression models based on a set of six independent variables commonly associated with compounds' absorption and distribution properties. It was established that the descriptors that have a particularly strong, positive influence on the ability of compounds to inhibit BChE expressed as p IC 50 are the count of rotatable bonds ( nRot ) and lipophilicity (log D ); p IC 50 is negatively correlated with flexibility ( Flex ), fraction of sp 3 carbon atoms ( F sp3 ), caco-2 permeability ( caco2 ), and plasma protein binding ability ( PPB ). The sunscreens that are likely to be particularly strong BChE inhibitors are Ethylhexyl Triazone (ET), Diethylhexyl Butamido Triazone (DOBT), Octocrylene (OCR), and Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate (DHHB). However, it must be stressed that ET and DOBT lie outside the chemical space of the reference compounds, so predictions for these two compounds should be treated with caution.

Age-dependent modulation of CYP450 and MXR activity and physiological trade-offs in Daphnia magna exposed to organic UV filters [PMID: 42173181 · 2026]
Ács A, Szántó A, Pirger Z, et al. · Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol (2026)

Organic UV filters are ubiquitous aquatic contaminants, yet their sublethal, age-specific effects on non-target invertebrates remain poorly understood. This study investigated the ontogenetic shifts in detoxification strategies of Daphnia magna exposed to three common UV filters (Avobenzone, Octocrylene, Octinoxate) and their environmentally relevant ternary mixture. By comparing 3-day-old juveniles and 6-day-old subadults, we integrated molecular biomarkers (in vivo ECOD and MXR efflux activity, and CAT/SOD antioxidant enzymes) with whole-organism physiological endpoints (heart rate and locomotion). Results revealed a distinct developmental window of susceptibility. Juveniles exhibited a highly responsive phenotype, characterized by robust MXR capacity and highly inducible CYP450 enzymes and active antioxidant mobilization. However, this active biochemical state was accompanied by pronounced bradycardia under chemical stress, consistent with the physiological cost of detoxification. In contrast, 6-day-old sub-adults displayed ttenuated molecular response pattern, showing lower biochemical inducibility but maintaining stable cardiac function. Alarmingly, Avobenzone acted as a dual-action toxicant in adults, simultaneously inhibiting both CYP metabolism and MXR efflux. Furthermore, the low-dose mixture compromised the adult MXR system without triggering explicit avoidance behaviour. These findings highlight that UV filters act as active modulators of the Daphnia defence network, emphasizing the need to incorporate life-stage specific vulnerabilities and mechanistic biomarkers into future ecological risk assessments.

Pending Food and Drug Administration approval of bemotrizinol: A potential turning point for United States sunscreen formulation [PMID: 42067042 · 2026]
Wang SQ, Osterwalder U, Lim HW · J Am Acad Dermatol (2026)
Multi-matrix assessment of organic UV-filters in a major freshwater recreational ecosystem in Central Europe: Spatio-temporal distribution and environmental risk assessment [PMID: 42000182 · 2026]
Németh Z, Fodor I, Svigruha R, et al. · Water Res (2026)

Organic UV-filters (OUVFs), key ingredients of sunscreens, are increasingly recognized as emerging anthropogenic contaminants; however, their occurrence, seasonal dynamics, and ecological risks in intensively used freshwater recreational lakes remain poorly characterized. By integrating advanced environmental analytics, ecological risk assessment, multiparametric emission modelling, and citizen-science data, we present the first multi-matrix assessment of five widely used OUVFs - avobenzone (AVO), octocrylene (OC), octinoxate (EHMC), iscotrizinol (DBT), and ethylhexyl triazone (EHT) - in Lake Balaton. The study area is the largest shallow freshwater lake in Central Europe and one of Europe's most intensively used recreational water bodies. Most of the investigated compounds are widely used across Europe and/or included in the 5th EU Watch List (2025) under the Water Framework Directive, underscoring their regulatory relevance. Our matrix-optimized SPE-UHPLC-MS/MS method enabled sensitive quantification across environmental compartments. Maximum concentrations reached up to 152,603 ng/L in surface water, 975 ng/g d.w. in sediment, 28,116 ng/g d.w. in periphyton, and 46,012 ng/g d.w. in biota. Risk quotient analysis revealed high acute environmental risk for four compounds (e.g., RQ_EHT = 107.5). A newly developed multiparametric emission model, which can be applied to any shallow lake to realistically estimate the load of OUVFs, further estimated that 4.8-284.1 tons of OUVFs may enter Lake Balaton during a 60-day bathing period via direct recreational inputs (medium-use scenario: approximately 65 tons). Our study provides the first comprehensive assessment of next-generation OUVFs in Lake Balaton and shows that shallow recreational lakes experience substantial contaminant pressure during peak tourist periods. The combined analytical, modelling, and citizen-science evidence identifies sunscreen-derived contamination in shallow recreational lakes as a recreational intensity-driven pathway, i.e. the dominant control variables remain the number of bathers and treated skin surface area. Our findings not only emphasize the urgent need to include OUVFs in monitoring programs but also highlight that the effective management of sunscreen-derived pollution for the long-term sustainability of freshwater lakes requires complementing compound-centered regulatory approaches with recreation-oriented intervention strategies.

Ultrafast Spectroscopy of Commercial Sunscreen Formulations in Thin Films and on a Skin Mimic [PMID: 41908471 · 2026]
Whittock AL, Woolley JM, Cébrian J, et al. · ACS Omega (2026)

The photodynamics of a given chromophore are usually affected by the surrounding environment (e.g., solvent or matrix). As a result, it is often assumed that the 'fundamental' spectroscopic behavior of a given chromophore, usually studied in dilute solution, is not relevant to the understanding of more complex mixtures. In this work, we demonstrate that the 'fundamental' photodynamics of common sunscreen UV filters are comparable to those observed in formulation, including the complex interactions between them, and even for formulation applied to a skin mimic. In particular, we have carried out ultrafast laser spectroscopy studies directly on sunscreen formulations containing methyl anthranilate (MA), ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC), and octocrylene (OCR) as commonly used UV filters. Our results not only have significant implications for the sunscreen industry, providing direct evidence of UV filter interactions in formulation, but importantly they are demonstrative of the relevance of 'fundamental' spectroscopic techniques to understanding real-life systems.

Screening-level exposure Models to Evaluate the direct Release of Cosmetic Ingredients (MERCI): Development and application to UV filters used in suncare products [PMID: 41697961 · 2026]
Gouin T, Roberts M, Williams WM, et al. · Integr Environ Assess Manag (2026)

Concerns regarding the environmental risks of UV-filters used in suncare products have grown in recent years. Much of this concern has been driven by their use in products by consumers engaged in outdoor recreational activities, such as swimming, which can facilitate their direct emissions into aquatic systems. Uncertainties in estimating the amount of a UV-filter that might be directly emitted to water, however, represent a continuing challenge, and include the need to quantify the number of users of suncare products, the skin area covered, the concentration of the UV-filter in the product and the extent to which the UV-filter is 'washed-off'. This study aims to address this gap, which includes the development and application of screening-level exposure Models to Evaluate the direct Release of Cosmetic Ingredients (MERCI). The tier 1 and 2 MERCI models-SUNscreen and multi-SUNscreen-are described, with application to octocrylene, a well-studied UV-filter used in suncare products. Model results suggest that both tools provide reasonable estimates of environmental exposure. Specifically, the tier 1 SUNscreen model, estimates an environmental concentration of 422&#x2009;ng&#xb7;L-1 in freshwater and range from 191-428&#x2009;ng&#xb7;L-1 in marine water capturing differences between low-moderate tidal dilution rates, whereas sediment concentrations are estimated to be 206&#x2009;ng&#xb7;g-1 dw (freshwater) and 94-210&#x2009;ng&#xb7;g-1 dw (marine). The tier 2 multi-SUNscreen model, on the other hand, estimates freshwater concentrations of 81&#x2009;ng&#xb7;L-1 in water and 0.5&#x2009;ng&#xb7;g-1 dw in sediment, results that are observed to be within an order of magnitude of monitoring data. Overall, both models support a conservative, screening-level approach for estimating environmental exposure to UV-filters, and thus represent tools that can be readily utilized to support both risk assessment and research prioritization.

Frequently Asked Questions (AEO Position 0)

Q1. What are the official 7-track regulatory label names for OCTOCRYLENE?
Standard label names are US PCPC INCI: 'OCTOCRYLENE', EU CosIng: 'OCTOCRYLENE', KR MFDS: 'OCTOCRYLENE (KR MFDS Registered)', CN NMPA IECIC: '奥克立林', and JP JCIA: 'OCTOCRYLENE'.
Q2. Is OCTOCRYLENE restricted or permitted in EU, US, KR, CN, and JP cosmetics?
Regulatory status summary across 6 jurisdictions — KR: restricted, EU: restricted, US: restricted, CN: restricted, JP: none, ASEAN: none.
Q3. What is the typical formulation concentration and optimal pH window for OCTOCRYLENE?
In sun_color systems, OCTOCRYLENE is typically formulated between 2% and 10% (median 4%), with an optimal stability window of pH 4–8.
Q4. What are the known formulation incompatibilities and synergy pairings for OCTOCRYLENE?
Recommended synergy pairings include GLYCERIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHEROL. Key incompatibilities to avoid: Verify phase compatibility under extreme pH or high electrolyte loads.