原料词典检索/decyl-glucoside/DECYL GLUCOSIDE
Tier 1 Monograph · SSOT 15 FieldsRaw .md (GEO) ↗
化学合成 (Synthetic)

DECYL GLUCOSIDE

中国 NMPA《已使用化妆品原料目录 (IECIC)》标准中文名: 癸基葡糖苷 (序号 #2687)
清洁剂乳化稳定剂
[EU CosIng Official Definition] Decyl Glucoside is the product obtained from the condensation of decyl alcohol with glucose
核心法规与安全结论 (Executive Fact Box)AEO / GEO CITATION ANCHOR

化妆品中 癸基葡糖苷 (DECYL GLUCOSIDE) 的全球法规限值与配方应用标准是什么?

癸基葡糖苷(标准 INCI: DECYL GLUCOSIDE,CAS 号: 54549-25-6)是化妆品配方中主要用作清洁剂, 乳化稳定剂的核心成分。受中国 NMPA(已使用/准用)、韩国 MFDS(未列管)及欧盟 CosIng(未列管)等 6 大法域法定标准监管,常规建议添加量为 0.1–0.2%(最佳稳定窗口 pH 4–8)。

全球 7 轨官方全成分标签名称对照表

严格采用各国政府官方目录原名 · 严禁机器翻译
7-Track Official Statutory Label Names for DECYL GLUCOSIDE
法域与监管轨道官方公告全成分标准名称一键复制
① 韩国 (MFDS 化妆品标准名称)DECYL GLUCOSIDE (KR MFDS Registered)
② 韩国旧名称历史 (301 重定向)——
③ 欧盟 (EU CosIng EC 1223/2009)DECYL GLUCOSIDE
④ 美国普通化妆品 (US PCPC / MoCRA INCI)DECYL GLUCOSIDE
⑤ 美国 OTC 防晒/祛痘专论活性物名称 (FDA OTC)— (非美国 OTC 专论活性成分 / 普通化妆品原料)—
⑥ 中国 (NMPA《已使用化妆品原料目录 IECIC》标准中文名)癸基葡糖苷
⑦ 日本普通化妆品 / 医药部外品 (JCIA / MHLW)DECYL GLUCOSIDE (标准 INCI 参照)

Layer 1 — 全球 6 大法域法定限值与监管状态

Layer 1 Statutory Regulatory Limits Across 6 Regions for DECYL GLUCOSIDE
法域监管状态法定限值适用条件与法定依据来源
韩国 (MFDS)未列管GMP已列入官方化妆品原料目录 (按 GMP 规范使用)
欧盟 (EU)未列管GMP已列入官方化妆品原料目录 (按 GMP 规范使用)
美国 (FDA)未列管GMP已列入官方化妆品原料目录 (按 GMP 规范使用)
中国 (NMPA)已使用/准用GMPIECIC Entry #2687
日本 (MHLW)未列管GMP已列入官方化妆品原料目录 (按 GMP 规范使用)
东盟 (ACD)未列管GMP已列入官方化妆品原料目录 (按 GMP 规范使用)
⚠️ 仅供参考 (免责声明): 本词典中的原料名称、法规限值与配比指南仅供研发参考。鉴于法规修订时差或潜在数据误差,实际配方设计、标签印制及备案前请务必核实主管部门最新官方公告原文;因使用本词典信息产生的任何问题,运营方概不承担法律责任。
Interactive Quartile Box-Plot (Min–Q1–Median–Q3–Max)

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Box-Plot vs. Statutory Limit

Aqueous Serum / Ampoulen=14
Min 0.1% · Q1 0.1% · Median 0.1% · Q3 0.2% · Max 0.2%
Rinse-off Cleansern=13
Min 1% · Q1 4% · Median 7% · Q3 10% · Max 15%
Emulsion / Creamn=16
Min 0.1% · Q1 0.2% · Median 0.2% · Q3 0.2125% · Max 5%
Sunscreen / Colorn=5
Min 0.1% · Q1 0.2% · Median 0.2% · Q3 0.2% · Max 0.3%
Aqueous Serum / Ampoule — Aqueous serum, toner & hydrogel matrix formulation component
Verified Source: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=14, GRANT 14) (cir_safety) · GRANT 14
Typical Median: 0.1%

Layer 3 — 剂型常规配比指南与理化配伍性

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Quartiles by Product Category for DECYL GLUCOSIDE
剂型分类Min – Q1 – Median – Q3 – Max (%)配方作用与机理Source ID
剂型组 A — 水剂爽肤水 / 精华液 / 安瓶0.1% · 0.1% · 0.1% · 0.2% · 0.2%Aqueous serum, toner & hydrogel matrix formulation componentGlobal Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=14, GRANT 14)
剂型组 C — 淋洗类洁面 / 洗发水 / 沐浴露1% · 4% · 7% · 10% · 15%Rinse-off cleanser & surfactant system modifierGlobal Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=13, SEPPIC 12 · EVONIK 1)
剂型组 B — 乳液 / 面霜 (O/W · W/O)0.1% · 0.2% · 0.2% · 0.2125% · 5%Emulsion cream & lotion structural / conditioning agentGlobal Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=16, GRANT 16)
剂型组 D — 防晒霜 / 彩妆 / 粉底0.1% · 0.2% · 0.2% · 0.2% · 0.3%Sun care & color cosmetics dispersion / sensory modifierGlobal Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=5, GRANT 5)
Cutaneous Permeation Science (500 Dalton Rule)MW: Macro/Complex · LogP: N/A

Stratum Corneum Penetration Depth & Bio-Spicule Transdermal Delivery

Stratum Corneum (Brick & Mortar Barrier · 10–20 µm)500 Da Molecular Weight Cutoff BarrierViable Epidermis (Keratinocytes & Melanocytes · 50–100 µm)Target for Brightening (Tyrosinase/Melanosome) & Barrier LipidsPapillary Dermis (Fibroblasts & ECM Collagen · 150–300 µm)Target for Collagen I/III Synthesis, Peptides, PDRN & ExosomesEpidermal Passive Permeation (<500 Da)
Molecular Weight & LogP Permeation Diagnosis
Low Molecular Weight (320 Da ≤ 500 Da) — Passive Permeation Feasible

Under passive topical application, molecules diffuse tortuously through intercellular lipids. Hydrophilic compounds >500 Da remain primarily on the outer stratum corneum.

Estimated Target Depth
40–90 µm
Optimal Delivery System
Polyol Enhancer / Serum
Colloid Interface, pH Spectrum & Thermal Stability

pH Stability Window (0–14), Thermal Limit & HLB Colloidal Phase Behavior

Water or glycol phase soluble/dispersible
Optimal Formulation pH Stability Window (0–14)pH 4.0 – 8.0
0245.5791114

Outside pH 4–8, risk of hydrolysis, viscosity loss, or ionic dissociation increases.

Maximum Thermal Processing Limit (°C)≤ 50°C
25°C45°C60°C75°C85°C100°C

Thermally stable up to 50°C during standard emulsification.

HLB Scale (0–20) & Colloidal Micelle / Lamellar Phase Simulator
O/W Oil-in-Water Micelle Emulsion (Lotion / Cream)
HLB 11.5
W/O (3–6)Lamellar (8–10.5)O/W Emulsion (11–15)Solubilizer (15–19)O/W Droplet
Biochemical Signaling & Mechanism Pathway

Cellular & Molecular Target Mechanism Flow

1. Epidermal Interaction→ Upregulation / Activation
Intercellular Lipid & Hydration Matrix
→
TEWL Reduction & Barrier Conditioning
2. Homeostasis Modulation⊣ Inhibition / Blockade
Oxidative Stress (ROS) & Irritant Cascade
⊣
Cutaneous Soothing & Homeostasis
Formulation Ontology Radial Graph

Interactive Synergy Pairings (Solid) & Incompatibility Warnings (Dashed)

+ GLYCERIN+ CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TR…+ TOCOPHEROL✕ Verify phase compati…DECYL GLUCOSIDE
Interactive Node Guide

Click any green synergy node to jump directly to its monograph, or click a red dashed node to inspect the chemical incompatibility mechanism.

代表性商品名参考 (商标法第90条第1款第2项说明性标示)
DECYL GLUCOSIDE

商品名仅供配方师识别原料规格参考,商标权归各原厂商所有。

学术与毒理综合摘要

Tier 1 Synthesis

本综述严格基于与该原料关联的 NIH PubMed 同行评审文献摘要及官方毒理学评估档案编写。

■ [1. Chemical Identity & International Labeling Nomenclature] - INCI Name: DECYL GLUCOSIDE | CAS No.: 54549-25-6 | EC No.: 259-218-1 - Origin: SYNTHETIC | Functions: , - Physicochemical Profile: Formula | MW /(Polymer/Complex) | / | Ionic Nature: non-ionic | CosIng/MFDS - Official Regional Label Names: US [DECYL GLUCOSIDE] · EU [DECYL GLUCOSIDE] · CN [癸基葡糖苷] · JP [-] · JP Quasi-Drug [-] ■ [2. Dermatological Mechanism of Action & Functional Role] - Decyl Glucoside is the product obtained from the condensation of decyl alcohol with glucose Classified under origin 'synthetic', it acts within the cosmetic vehicle or stratum corneum to deliver , performance and structural formulation stability. ■ [3. Global 6-Jurisdiction Regulatory Status & Safety Limits (Layer 1 & Layer 2)] - Regional Summary: KR: NONE | EU: NONE | US: NONE | CN: ALLOWED | JP: NONE | ASEAN: NONE (CN IECIC (2025) Entry No. 2687 (癸基葡糖苷)) - No specific Annex prohibition or numeric restriction across the 6 major jurisdictions (Permitted under general GMP safety assessment). - Official Safety & Historical Use Concentration (Layer 2): Quantum satis (QS) within standard cosmetic safety margins ■ [4. Formulation Dosage Guide by Product Category (Layer 3-A)] - [aqueous_serum] Typical range: 0.1 ~ 0.2% (Median 0.1%, Ref: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=14, GRANT 14)) — Aqueous serum, toner & hydrogel matrix formulation component - [cleanser_rinse] Typical range: 1.0 ~ 15.0% (Median 7.0%, Ref: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=13, SEPPIC 12 · EVONIK 1)) — Rinse-off cleanser & surfactant system modifier - [emulsion_cream] Typical range: 0.1 ~ 5.0% (Median 0.2%, Ref: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=16, GRANT 16)) — Emulsion cream & lotion structural / conditioning agent ■ [5. Formulation Engineering, Stability & Incompatibility Matrix (Layer 3-B)] - Addition Phase: Water Phase or Cool-down Phase (< 45°C) - Optimal pH Range: pH 4.0 ~ 8.0 | Max Process Temp: Max 50°C | Electrolyte Tolerance: MEDIUM - Incompatibility / Caution: Verify phase compatibility under extreme pH or high electrolyte loads - Synergy Pairings: GLYCERIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHEROL | Reference Trade Names: DECYL GLUCOSIDE ■ [6. Peer-Reviewed Literature & Official Compendia Evidence] - PMID 42289776 (2026, Contact Dermatitis): Alkyl Glucosides in Rinse-Off and Leave-On Cosmetics Available on the Dutch Market - PMID 41707668 (2026, Contact Dermatitis): Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Alkyl Glucosides: Becoming More Relevant in Facial Dermatitis? - PMID 41503492 (2026, RSC Adv): Decyl glucoside as a sustainable surfactant for cosmetic formulations: environmental stability under hardness, pH, and t

关联同行评审文献 (NIH PubMed) (12)

Alkyl Glucosides in Rinse-Off and Leave-On Cosmetics Available on the Dutch Market [PMID: 42289776 · 2026]
Ya&#xe2;koubi M, Ipenburg NA, Groot AC, Rustemeyer T · Contact Dermatitis (2026)
Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Alkyl Glucosides: Becoming More Relevant in Facial Dermatitis? [PMID: 41707668 · 2026]
Patel K, Brasher TR, Palmer A, Nixon RL · Contact Dermatitis (2026)
Decyl glucoside as a sustainable surfactant for cosmetic formulations: environmental stability under hardness, pH, and temperature variations [PMID: 41503492 · 2026]
Abushuhel M, Priya GP, Al-Hasnaawei S, Ray S, Pal A, Sharma R, Chauhan AS, Amiri S · RSC Adv (2026)

Environmental variability (including fluctuations in water hardness, pH, and temperature) can markedly affect the performance and stability of surfactants in cosmetic formulations. This study systematically evaluates the environmental robustness of three representative surfactants-Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate (SLES, anionic), Cocamidopropyl Betaine (CAPB, amphoteric), and Decyl glucoside (non-ionic)-with a focus on the sustainable performance of decyl glucoside in diverse conditions. Physicochemical parameters including surface tension, critical micelle concentration (CMC), viscosity, and physical stability were analyzed across hardness levels (0-400 mg per L CaCO 3 ), pH (5.5-9.0), and temperatures (4-40 &#xb0;C). SLES exhibited pronounced sensitivity to hard water, showing increased surface tension (32.5 &#x2192; 36.8 mN m -1 ) and elevated CMC (0.25 &#x2192; 0.45 mM), resulting in precipitation and reduced viscosity. CAPB demonstrated moderate resilience (CMC 0.15-0.24 mM), while decyl glucoside maintained stable physicochemical behavior (CMC &#x2248; 1.0 mM) regardless of ionic or thermal stress. Statistical analyses (ANOVA, p &lt; 0.01) confirmed significant environmental effects on ionic surfactants but not on decyl glucoside. Mechanistic interpretation based on ion-micelle interactions revealed that the non-ionic structure of decyl glucoside prevents cation binding and aggregation, ensuring consistent interfacial activity and viscosity. The results highlight decyl glucoside's superior environmental stability, biodegradability, and formulation compatibility, positioning it as an ideal candidate for next-generation eco-friendly cosmetics. This work advances the understanding of surfactant-environment interactions and supports sustainable formulation design aligned with green chemistry principles.

Contact Allergy to Preservatives and Emulsifiers in Patients With or Without Atopic Dermatitis [PMID: 41184211 · 2026]
Houlberg MNA, N&#xf8;rreslet LB, Wolff ELG, Svendsen SV, Mose KF, Mortz CG · Contact Dermatitis (2026)

Globally, 20% of children and up to 10% of adults have atopic dermatitis (AD). The impaired skin barrier function among AD patients may predispose them to a higher risk of contact allergy. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of contact allergy to preservatives and emulsifiers in AD patients compared with other dermatological patients (non-AD) patch tested in the period 2006-2023, as well as assess clinical relevance. A retrospective analysis of patch test data was performed among 7936 patients consecutively patch tested with preservatives and emulsifiers in the baseline series at the Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Overall, no association between AD and contact allergy to preservatives was found. However, significantly more AD patients compared to non-AD patients had contact allergy to 2-Bromo-2-Nitropropane-1,3-Diol (1.8% versus 0.6%) and the emulsifier decyl glucoside (14.3% versus 3.1%). Non-AD patients had significantly more contact allergy to benzisothiazolinone (15.4%) compared to AD patients (8.1%). This study showed no overall association between AD and a higher risk of developing contact allergy to preservatives, although differences were identified for a few individual preservatives and for decyl glucoside.

Application of Alkyl Polyglucosides as Components of the Extraction Medium in the Preparation of a Shampoo Cosmetic Formulation Containing Substances Isolated from Red Grape Pomace [PMID: 41011709 · 2025]
Wasilewski T, Hordyjewicz-Baran Z, Sabura E, Malorna K, Dresler E, Zegarski M, Stanek-Wandzel N · Molecules (2025)

This study highlights the use of alkyl polyglucosides (APGs) as sustainable and mild surfactants in cosmetic preparations, such as shampoos, following the principles of green chemistry and environmentally friendly development. APGs are non-ionic surfactants of plant origin. Their favorable dermatological and toxicological profile, as well as their high skin compatibility, make them an excellent alternative to conventional surfactants used in cosmetic products. To increase the sustainability and functionality of cosmetic preparations, the concept of loan extraction was applied, in which the extraction medium is borrowed from the final cosmetic formulation. After the extraction process, the medium enriched with the extracted compounds is returned to the cosmetic. The APGs, as part of cosmetic formulations, were used in the micellar extraction process of grape pomace, a by-product of wine production. The study evaluated the effect of different types of APGs-coco-glucoside and decyl glucoside-and their concentrations on extraction efficiency, measured by LC-MS/MS based on the content of phenolic compounds and amino acids, as well as the total phenolic content, total anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity assessed by UV-Vis spectroscopy. The designed extraction medium was then used to develop a shampoo, which showed a significantly lower zein value compared to the reference preparation without extract, indicating a reduced skin irritation potential. These results highlight the potential of APG in the development of milder, sustainable cosmetic products with the ability to extract bioactive components, supporting their use in the production of environmentally friendly cosmetics.

Frequent Positive Patch Test Reactions to Glucosides in Children: A Call for Caution? [PMID: 40394829 · 2025]
Kanokrungsee S, Leysen J, Aerts O, Dendooven E · Contact Dermatitis (2025)

Alkyl glucosides are surfactants commonly found in cosmetics and household products. However, data on glucoside contact allergy in paediatric populations is limited. To determine the prevalence, relevance and clinical characteristics of contact allergy to glucosides in children. A retrospective review of the files of paediatric patients (&#x2264;&#x2009;16&#x2009;years) who underwent patch testing for decyl glucoside (DG) and/or lauryl glucoside (LG) at the Antwerp University Hospital (UZA) in the period between January 2018 and December 2024. Among 241 children tested for DG, 148 (61.4%) were also tested for LG. DG reactions were observed in 47 patients (19.5%), with 27 (11.2%) considered positive. LG reactions occurred in 17/148 (13%), but only 4 (2.7%) were positive, all with concomitant DG reactions. Most positive DG reactions were weak (+) (25/27), whereas only 2 were strong (++). The median age was 7&#x2009;years (range: 2-15), with 51.9% female. Culprit sources mostly included cosmetics. Patch test reactions to glucosides readily occur in children, and the positivity rate is surprisingly high. Besides many irritant and doubtful reactions, false-positive (+) reactions likely occur, particularly in young atopic children. Careful interpretation of positive results and complementary work-up may thus be necessary.

Use of sorbitan sesquioleate in patch test preparations and patch testing with the substance-What do our results mean? [PMID: 36305668 · 2023]
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Svedman C · Contact Dermatitis (2023)

Sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO) is a sorbitan fatty acid ester, an emulsifier used in topical products and certain patch test preparations. SSO may affect the patch test results. It has been debated whether to include the substance in the baseline series to avoid misinterpretation of the results. To report the prevalence and simultaneous reactions of SSO with other patch test preparations containing SSO as an emulsifier. A retrospective analysis of 3539 dermatitis patients who underwent patch testing from 2016 to 2020 was performed. The 5-year SSO contact allergy prevalence was 0.48%, and 1.3% had a doubtful reaction. Patients with a stronger positive reaction (2+, 3+) were more likely to react simultaneously to other allergen preparations containing SSO (p value&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.018). One patient with a strong reaction to SSO reacted positively to all SSO-containing patch test preparations. Definite fragrance allergens could not be identified in the patients who had simultaneous reactions to SSO and fragrance mix (FM) I. Patch testing with allergen preparations containing SSO affected the patch test interpretation. Fragrance contact allergy could not be ruled out when a patient simultaneously reacted to SSO and FM I. Changing emulsifiers in patch test preparations would be advantageous.

Co-reactivity of glucosides: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data 2019-2020 [PMID: 36268749 · 2023]
Warshaw EM, Xiong M, DeKoven JG, Taylor JS, Belsito DV, Reeder MJ, Adler BL, Pratt MD, Atwater AR, Maibach HI, Silverberg JI, Yu J, Botto N, Fowler JF, Houle MC, Mowad CM, Dunnick CA, DeLeo VA · Contact Dermatitis (2023)
Patch testing with glucosides: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group experience, 2009-2018 [PMID: 35551968 · 2022]
Warshaw EM, Xiong M, Atwater AR, DeKoven JG, Pratt MD, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Belsito DV, Silverberg JI, Reeder MJ, Zug KA, Sasseville D, Fowler JF, DeLeo VA, Houle MC, Dunnick CA · J Am Acad Dermatol (2022)

Alkyl glucosides are nonionic surfactants that are increasingly used in personal care products. To characterize positive patch test reactions to decyl glucoside (5% petrolatum, tested 2009-2018) and lauryl glucoside (3% petrolatum, tested 2017-2018). Retrospective analysis of patients tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Of 24,097 patients patch tested to decyl and/or lauryl glucoside, 470 (2.0%) had positive reactions. Compared with glucoside-negative patients, glucoside-positive patients had higher odds of occupational skin disease (13.4% vs 10.1%; P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.0207), history of hay fever (38.5% vs 31.6%; P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.0014), atopic dermatitis (39.0% vs 28.6%; P&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;.0001), and/or asthma (21.8% vs 16.5%; P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.0023). Most glucoside reactions (83.9%) were currently relevant. The most common source was personal care products (63.0%), especially hair products (16.5%) and skin cleansers (15.2%). Of 4933 patients tested to decyl and lauryl glucoside, 134 (2.7%) were positive to 1 or both; 43.4% (43 of 99) of decyl-positive patients were also positive to lauryl glucoside and 55.1% (43/78) of lauryl glucoside patients were also positive to decyl glucoside. The cohort predominantly reflects a referral population, and follow-up after testing was not captured. Glucoside positivity occurred in 2.0% of the tested patients. Reactions were often clinically relevant and linked to personal care products. Cross-reactivity was &gt;40%.

European patch test results with audit allergens as candidates for inclusion in the European Baseline Series, 2019/20: Joint results of the ESSCA(A) and the EBS(B) working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC(C) [PMID: 35099073 · 2022]
Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, Bauer A, Borrego L, Buhl T, Cooper SM, Dickel H, Gallo R, Gim&#xe9;nez-Arnau AM, John SM, Navarini AA, Pesonen M, P&#xf3;nyai G, Rustemeyer T, Schliemann S, Schubert S, Schuttelaar MA, Valiukevi&#x10d;ien&#x117; S, Wagner N, Weisshaar E, Gon&#xe7;alo M, ESSCA and EBS ESCD working groups, and the GEIDAC · Contact Dermatitis (2022)

In 2019, a number of allergens (haptens), henceforth, "the audit allergens," were considered as potential additions to the European Baseline Series (EBS), namely, sodium metabisulfite, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, Compositae mix II (2.5% or 5% pet), linalool hydroperoxides (lin-OOH), limonene hydroperoxides (lim-OOH), benzisothiazolinone (BIT), octylisothiazolinone (OIT), decyl glucoside, and lauryl glucoside; Evernia furfuracea (tree moss), was additionally tested by some departments as well. To collect further data on patch test reactivity and clinical relevance of the audit allergens in consecutive patients across Europe. Patch test data covering the audit allergens in 2019 and 2020 were collected by those departments of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies testing these, as well as further collaborators from the EBS working group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD), and the Spanish Grupo Espa&#xf1;ol de Investigaci&#xf3;n en Dermatitis de Contacto y Alergia Cut&#xe1;nea. As patch test outcome, reactions between day (D) 3 and D5 were considered. Altogether n&#xa0;=&#x2009;12&#x2009;403 patients were tested with any of the audit allergen. Positive reactions were most common to lin-OOH 1% pet. (8.74% [95%CI: 8.14-9.37%]), followed by lin-OOH 0.5% pet., and lim-OOH 0.3% pet (5.41% [95% CI: 4.95-5.89%]). Beyond these terpene hydroperoxides, BIT 0.1% pet. was the second most common allergen with 4.72% (95% CI: 4.2-5.28%), followed by sodium metabisulfite 1% pet. (3.75% [95%CI: 3.32-4.23%]) and Compositae mix 5% pet. (2.31% [95% CI: 1.84-2.87%]). For some allergens, clinical relevance was frequently difficult to ascertain. Despite many positive patch test reactions, it remains controversial whether lin- and lim-OOH should be tested routinely, while at least the two preservatives BIT and sodium metabisulfite appear suitable. The present results are a basis for further discussion and ultimately decision on their implementation into routine testing among the ESCD members.

The History of Surfactants and Review of Their Allergic and Irritant Properties [PMID: 34524773 · 2021]
Presley CL, Militello M, Barber C, Ladd R, Laughter M, Ferguson H, Dewey J, Pulsipher KJ, Rundle CW, Dunnick CA · Dermatitis (2021)

Surfactants, many of which are used as detergents, can be found in many common household items, such as shampoos, conditioners, soaps, and cosmetics. One should recognize the multitude of surfactants that are used in today's products to identify any potential allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) or irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). Given their abundance in everyday products, it is understandable that many cases of occupational contact dermatitis that arise can be attributed to surfactants. The products most connected with ACD are cocamidopropyl betaine, oleamidopropyl dimethylamine, decyl glucoside, 3-dimethylaminopropylamine, amidoamine, and cocamide diethanolamine. Similarly, the most common surfactant-related causes of ICD are sodium lauryl sulfate and benzalkonium chloride. It is important for dermatologists to identify the causes and differentiate between the two, to adjust treatments and products accordingly. Here, the most frequently used surfactants, as well as their correlation between ACD and ICD, will be reviewed.

Extracts from By-Products of the Fruit and Vegetable Industry as Ingredients Improving the Properties of Cleansing Gels [PMID: 41471714 · 2025]
Blicharz-Kania A, Iwanek M, Pecyna A · Molecules (2025)

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding extracts obtained from by-products on the physicochemical and functional properties of cleansing gels. Micellar extraction (2% decyl glucoside solution in water) was performed on secondary raw materials: banana peel (BP), pomegranate peel (PP), tomato pomace (TP), and grape pomace (GP). The extracts were analyzed for soluble substances and active compounds (polyphenols, carotenoids, and vitamin C). Cleansing gels containing plant extracts were also prepared and evaluated for their color and physicochemical and functional properties. The extracts contained natural polyphenols (10.99-16.54 mg&#xb7;100 mL -1 ), carotenoids (1.391-2.402 mg&#xb7;mL -1 ), and vitamin C (0.651-1.529 mg&#xb7;100 mL -1 ). The extract-enriched gels showed altered color (lower brightness, greater redness and yellowness), enhanced foaming properties, and modified viscosity (402.9-416.8 mPA for BP and GP; lower for PP and TP). The pH of the gels ranged from 5.391 to 5.917, which is within the physiological range of human skin. Dissolution times were reduced by up to 60% compared to the control, with PP extract producing the shortest time of 15.7 min. These results indicate that plant by-product extracts can improve both the functional performance and skin compatibility of cleaning gels.

常见问题解答 (FAQ)

Q1. 癸基葡糖苷 (DECYL GLUCOSIDE) 在全球 7 大法域的官方全成分标签名称是什么?
中国 NMPA《已使用化妆品原料目录 (IECIC)》标准中文名为 '癸基葡糖苷',美国 PCPC 与欧盟 CosIng 标准 INCI 为 'DECYL GLUCOSIDE',日本 JCIA 表示名称为 'DECYL GLUCOSIDE'。
Q2. 癸基葡糖苷 (DECYL GLUCOSIDE) 在中、韩、欧、美、日、东盟的法定监管状态 (Layer 1) 如何?
6 大法域监管汇总 — 中国(CN): allowed,韩国(KR): none,欧盟(EU): none,美国(US): none,日本(JP): none,东盟(ASEAN): none。
Q3. 癸基葡糖苷 (DECYL GLUCOSIDE) 的常规配方添加量 (Layer 3) 与最佳稳定 pH 窗口是多少?
在代表性剂型 (aqueous_serum) 中常规添加量为 0.1%–0.2%(中位数 0.1%),最佳稳定 pH 范围为 4–8。
Q4. 癸基葡糖苷 (DECYL GLUCOSIDE) 有哪些配伍禁忌 (Incompatibilities) 与协同增效组合?
推荐协同组合包括 GLYCERIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHEROL;配伍禁忌注意:Verify phase compatibility under extreme pH or high electrolyte loads。