원료 사전 탐색/decyl-glucoside/DECYL GLUCOSIDE
Tier 1 Monograph · SSOT 15 FieldsRaw .md (GEO) ↗
합성 (Synthetic)

DECYL GLUCOSIDE

식약처 한글 표준명: 데실글루코사이드
세정제유화안정제
[식약처 공정서 기원 및 정의] 이 원료는 데실알코올과 글루코오스의 축합으로 얻은 물질이다.
[EU CosIng Official Definition] Decyl Glucoside is the product obtained from the condensation of decyl alcohol with glucose
결론 선행 Executive Regulatory & Safety Fact BoxAEO / GEO CITATION ANCHOR

화장품에서 데실글루코사이드 (DECYL GLUCOSIDE)의 글로벌 배합 한도와 핵심 효능·처방 기준은 무엇인가요?

데실글루코사이드(표준 INCI: DECYL GLUCOSIDE, CAS 번호: 54549-25-6)은 화장품 처방에서 주로 세정제, 유화안정제 목적으로 배합되는 핵심 원료입니다. 한국 식약처(미규제) 및 유럽 CosIng(미규제) 등 6대 권역 법정 기준 하에 관리되며, 통상 0.1–0.2%(적정 pH 4–8) 범위에서 안정적으로 처방됩니다.

7대 갈래 국가별·용도별 공식 전성분 라벨 표기명 매트릭스

각국 1차 법원 고시 정본 · 기계번역·임의 음차 0건
7-Track Official Statutory Label Names for DECYL GLUCOSIDE
국가·규제 트랙공식 고시 전성분 표기명원클릭 복사
① 한국 (MFDS 화장품 한글 표준명)데실글루코사이드
② 한국 구명칭 (개정 전 이력 · 301 리다이렉트)——
③ 유럽 (EU CosIng EC 1223/2009)DECYL GLUCOSIDE
④ 미국 일반화장품 (US PCPC / MoCRA INCI)DECYL GLUCOSIDE
⑤ 미국 OTC (FDA Active Ingredient Monograph)— (비-OTC 일반 화장품 원료)—
⑥ 중국 (NMPA IECIC 표준 중문명)癸基葡糖苷
⑦ 일본 일반화장품 / 의약부외품 (JCIA / MHLW)DECYL GLUCOSIDE (표준 INCI 기준 · 임의 가타카나 변환 배제)

Layer 1 — 글로벌 6대 권역 법정 배합 한도 및 규제 상태

Layer 1 Statutory Regulatory Limits Across 6 Regions for DECYL GLUCOSIDE
권역규제 상태배합 한도제한 조건 및 1차 법원 출처
한국 (MFDS)미규제GMP공식 화장품 원료 목록 등재 (GMP 기준 사용)
유럽 (CosIng)미규제GMP공식 화장품 원료 목록 등재 (GMP 기준 사용)
미국 (FDA/CIR)미규제GMP공식 화장품 원료 목록 등재 (GMP 기준 사용)
중국 (NMPA)등재·허용GMPIECIC Entry #2687
일본 (MHLW)미규제GMP공식 화장품 원료 목록 등재 (GMP 기준 사용)
아세안 (ACD)미규제GMP공식 화장품 원료 목록 등재 (GMP 기준 사용)
⚠️ 참조용 안내 (법적 면책 공지): 이 사전의 성분명·규제 한도·배합 가이드는 연구·개발 참조용으로만 제공됩니다. 각국 고시 개정 시차나 데이터 오기·누락이 있을 수 있으므로, 실제 제품 처방·라벨 표기·인허가 전에는 반드시 관할 기관(식약처 등)의 최신 공식 고시 원문을 직접 확인하시기 바라며, 본 사전의 정보를 잘못 사용하여 발생하는 문제에 대해 운영 주체는 법적 책임을 지지 않습니다.
제형군별 사분위수(Min–Q1–Median–Q3–Max) 분포 그래프

Layer 3 제형군별 통상 배합 농도(%) 레인지 & Layer 1 법정 한도 대조

수성 토너·세럼·앰플n=14
Min 0.1% · Q1 0.1% · Median 0.1% · Q3 0.2% · Max 0.2%
세정 폼·샴푸 (린스오프)n=13
Min 1% · Q1 4% · Median 7% · Q3 10% · Max 15%
O/W · W/O 에멀전·크림n=16
Min 0.1% · Q1 0.2% · Median 0.2% · Q3 0.2125% · Max 5%
자외선차단·색조n=5
Min 0.1% · Q1 0.2% · Median 0.2% · Q3 0.2% · Max 0.3%
수성 토너·세럼·앰플 — 수성 세럼·토너·하이드로겔 처방 베이스 및 기능성 부여
공식 검증 원천: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=14, GRANT 14) (cir_safety) · GRANT 14
권장 중앙값: 0.1%

Layer 3 — 제형군별 통상 배합 농도(n≥5 사분위수) & 물리화학·상용성 가이드

Layer 3 Formulation Concentration Quartiles by Product Category for DECYL GLUCOSIDE
제형군 분류Min – Q1 – Median – Q3 – Max (%)처방 역할 및 기전Source ID
제형군 A — 수성 토너 · 세럼 · 고농축 앰플0.1% · 0.1% · 0.1% · 0.2% · 0.2%수성 세럼·토너·하이드로겔 처방 베이스 및 기능성 부여Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=14, GRANT 14)
제형군 C — 세정 워시오프 · 폼 · 샴푸 · 바디워시1% · 4% · 7% · 10% · 15%린스오프 세정·클렌징 처방 계면 안정화 및 사용감 개선Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=13, SEPPIC 12 · EVONIK 1)
제형군 B — 유화 로션 · 에멀전 · 크림 (O/W · W/O)0.1% · 0.2% · 0.2% · 0.2125% · 5%유화 로션·크림 제형 구조 형성 및 피부 컨디셔닝Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=16, GRANT 16)
제형군 D — 자외선차단제(선크림) · 색조 · 파운데이션0.1% · 0.2% · 0.2% · 0.2% · 0.3%선케어·색조 메이크업 분산 안정화 및 발림성 조절Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=5, GRANT 5)
피부 투과 과학 시각화 (Bos & Meinardi 500 Dalton Rule)MW: Macro/Complex · LogP: N/A

각질층 장벽 투과 깊이 & 바이오 스피큘 경피전달(DDS) 시뮬레이션

각질층 (Stratum Corneum · 10~20 µm)500 Dalton 장벽 (고분자·친수성 성분 차단)생존 표피층 (Viable Epidermis · 50~100 µm)멜라닌세포 · 각질형성세포 타깃 (미백·장벽·턴오버)진피 유두층 (Papillary Dermis · 150~300 µm)섬유아세포 콜라겐 I/III · 엘라스틴 · PDRN 재생 타깃표피~상부 진피 확산 (<500 Da)
분자량(MW) & 친유성(LogP) 투과 판정
저분자 영역 (320 Da ≤ 500 Da) — 각질층 수동 확산 가능

단독 도포 시 각질층 세포간 지질(Brick & Mortar) 경로를 통해 확산됩니다. 500 Dalton 이상 친수성 분자는 각질층 표면에 주로 머물러 보습·보호막 역할을 수행합니다.

예상 도달 깊이
40–90 µm
권장 전달 시스템
Polyol Enhancer / Serum
계면화학 · pH · 열역학 공정 시각화

pH 안정성 스펙트럼(0~14) · 가열 한계 게이지 · HLB 콜로이드 상거동

Water or glycol phase soluble/dispersible
적정 처방 pH 안전 윈도우 (pH 0 ~ 14 스펙트럼)pH 4.0 – 8.0
0245.5791114

권장 구간 밖(pH < 4 또는 pH > 8)에서는 가수분해·점도 저하·이온 탈리 위험이 증가합니다.

공정 가열 한계 온도 (Max Process Temp)≤ 50°C
25°C45°C60°C75°C85°C100°C

최대 50°C 가열 공정에서 열적 안정성이 유지됩니다.

계면활성·유화 HLB 스펙트럼 (0 ~ 20) & 미셀/액정 배열 시뮬레이터
O/W 수중유형 미셀 에멀전 (수분 크림·로션)
HLB 11.5
W/O (3–6)Lamellar (8–10.5)O/W Emulsion (11–15)Solubilizer (15–19)O/W Droplet
생화학 신호전달 경로 (Biochemical Pathway Map)

세포·분자 타깃 작용 기전 플로우 다이어그램

1. 각질층·표피 작용→ 촉진·활성 (Activation)
각질층 세포간 지질 & 수분 결합 네트워크
→
경피수분손실(TEWL) 억제 및 피부결 개선
2. 염증 매개체 조절⊣ 억제·차단 (Inhibition)
외부 자극 유도 산화 스트레스(ROS) 및 사이토카인
⊣
피부 진정 및 항상성 유지
처방 온톨로지 네트워크 그래프

권장 시너지(🟢 실선) & 배합 금기·주의(🔴 점선) 인터랙티브 관계도

+ GLYCERIN+ CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TR…+ TOCOPHEROL✕ 처방 내 극단적 pH 조건 및 고농도…DECYL GLUCOSIDE
노드 인터랙션 가이드

🟢 초록색 시너지 원료 노드를 클릭하면 해당 원료 모노그래프로 즉시 이동하며, 🔴 붉은색 점선 노드를 클릭하면 화학적 상충(석출·변색·실활) 메커니즘을 표시합니다.

대표 상용명 참고 (상표법 제90조 제1항 제2호 설명적 표기)
DECYL GLUCOSIDE

상용명 표기는 상표법 제90조 제1항 제2호에 의거하여 연구원에게 원료 등급·규격을 설명하기 위한 참고용이며, 각 상표의 권리는 해당 원료사에 귀속됩니다.

학술·독성·제형 종합 요약 (Tier 1~3 탄력 요약)

Tier 1 Synthesis

이 원료에 매칭된 PubMed 동료심사 논문 초록과 공인 독성 보고서만으로 작성된 학술 요약입니다.

■ [1. 화학적 정체성 및 규격 (Chemical Identity & Standard Nomenclature)] - 표준명: 데실글루코사이드 | INCI: DECYL GLUCOSIDE | CAS No.: 54549-25-6 | EC No.: 259-218-1 - 기원 및 분류: SYNTHETIC | 주요 기능: 세정제, 유화안정제 - 물리화학 스펙: 분자식 복합 조성이거나 단일 화학식 미지정 | 분자량 고분자/복합물(Polymer/Complex) | 친수/친유 밸런스 특화 | 이온성: non-ionic | CosIng/MFDS 등재 - 7대 권역 공식 라벨 표기: KR [데실글루코사이드] · EU [DECYL GLUCOSIDE] · US [DECYL GLUCOSIDE] · CN [癸基葡糖苷] · JP [-] · JP의약부외품 [-] ■ [2. 피부과학적 작용 기전 및 제형 내 역할 (Mechanism of Action & Function)] - 이 원료는 데실알코올과 글루코오스의 축합으로 얻은 물질이다. 물리화학적 분류상 기원(synthetic)에 기반하여 피부 장벽 및 제형 매트릭스 내에서 고유한 기능(세정제, 유화안정제)을 수행하며, 계면 안정화·보습·피부 컨디셔닝 또는 유효성분 전달에 기여합니다. ■ [3. 글로벌 6대 권역 법정 규제 및 안전성 한도 (Layer 1 & Layer 2 Regulatory Matrix)] - 6개국 요약: KR: NONE | EU: NONE | US: NONE | CN: ALLOWED | JP: NONE | ASEAN: NONE (중국 IECIC(2025) 등재번호 2687 (癸基葡糖苷)) - 6대 주요 권역(KR·EU·US·CN·JP·ASEAN) 별도 배합금지/특수제한 고시 없음 (GMP 일반 안전 기준 내 배합 허용). - 공인 안전성·역사적 사용 농도(Layer 2): 제형 목적 및 GMP 안전성 평가 범위 내 적량(QS) 사용 ■ [4. 제형군별 통상 배합 가이드 (Layer 3-A Formulation Dosage Guide)] - [aqueous_serum] 권장 범위: 0.1 ~ 0.2% (중앙값 0.1%, 근거: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=14, GRANT 14)) — 수성 세럼·토너·하이드로겔 처방 베이스 및 기능성 부여 - [cleanser_rinse] 권장 범위: 1.0 ~ 15.0% (중앙값 7.0%, 근거: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=13, SEPPIC 12 · EVONIK 1)) — 린스오프 세정·클렌징 처방 계면 안정화 및 사용감 개선 - [emulsion_cream] 권장 범위: 0.1 ~ 5.0% (중앙값 0.2%, 근거: Global Starter Formulation Library Statistical Distribution (n=16, GRANT 16)) — 유화 로션·크림 제형 구조 형성 및 피부 컨디셔닝 ■ [5. 연구원 공정 설계 · 안정성 · 배합 금기 (Layer 3-B Process & Compatibility)] - 투입 공정(Phase): Water Phase or Cool-down Phase (< 45°C) - 적정 pH 구간: pH 4.0 ~ 8.0 | 공정 내열 온도: 최대 50°C | 전해질(염) 내성: MEDIUM - 배합 주의/금기: 처방 내 극단적 pH 조건 및 고농도 전해질과의 상용성 사전 확인 권장 - 시너지 추천 원료: GLYCERIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHEROL | 참고 상용 원료명: DECYL GLUCOSIDE ■ [6. 학술 논문 및 공인 문헌 근거 (Peer-Reviewed Literature & Compendia)] - PMID 42289776 (2026, Contact Dermatitis): Alkyl Glucosides in Rinse-Off and Leave-On Cosmetics Available on the Dutch Market - PMID 41707668 (2026, Contact Dermatitis): Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Alkyl Glucosides: Becoming More Relevant in Facial Dermatitis? - PMID 41503492 (2026, RSC Adv): Decyl glucoside as a sustainable surfactant for cosmetic formulations: environmental stability under hardness, pH, and t

근거 동료심사 학술 논문 (미국 NIH PubMed) (12)

Alkyl Glucosides in Rinse-Off and Leave-On Cosmetics Available on the Dutch Market [PMID: 42289776 · 2026]
Ya&#xe2;koubi M, Ipenburg NA, Groot AC, Rustemeyer T · Contact Dermatitis (2026)
Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Alkyl Glucosides: Becoming More Relevant in Facial Dermatitis? [PMID: 41707668 · 2026]
Patel K, Brasher TR, Palmer A, Nixon RL · Contact Dermatitis (2026)
Decyl glucoside as a sustainable surfactant for cosmetic formulations: environmental stability under hardness, pH, and temperature variations [PMID: 41503492 · 2026]
Abushuhel M, Priya GP, Al-Hasnaawei S, Ray S, Pal A, Sharma R, Chauhan AS, Amiri S · RSC Adv (2026)

Environmental variability (including fluctuations in water hardness, pH, and temperature) can markedly affect the performance and stability of surfactants in cosmetic formulations. This study systematically evaluates the environmental robustness of three representative surfactants-Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate (SLES, anionic), Cocamidopropyl Betaine (CAPB, amphoteric), and Decyl glucoside (non-ionic)-with a focus on the sustainable performance of decyl glucoside in diverse conditions. Physicochemical parameters including surface tension, critical micelle concentration (CMC), viscosity, and physical stability were analyzed across hardness levels (0-400 mg per L CaCO 3 ), pH (5.5-9.0), and temperatures (4-40 &#xb0;C). SLES exhibited pronounced sensitivity to hard water, showing increased surface tension (32.5 &#x2192; 36.8 mN m -1 ) and elevated CMC (0.25 &#x2192; 0.45 mM), resulting in precipitation and reduced viscosity. CAPB demonstrated moderate resilience (CMC 0.15-0.24 mM), while decyl glucoside maintained stable physicochemical behavior (CMC &#x2248; 1.0 mM) regardless of ionic or thermal stress. Statistical analyses (ANOVA, p &lt; 0.01) confirmed significant environmental effects on ionic surfactants but not on decyl glucoside. Mechanistic interpretation based on ion-micelle interactions revealed that the non-ionic structure of decyl glucoside prevents cation binding and aggregation, ensuring consistent interfacial activity and viscosity. The results highlight decyl glucoside's superior environmental stability, biodegradability, and formulation compatibility, positioning it as an ideal candidate for next-generation eco-friendly cosmetics. This work advances the understanding of surfactant-environment interactions and supports sustainable formulation design aligned with green chemistry principles.

Contact Allergy to Preservatives and Emulsifiers in Patients With or Without Atopic Dermatitis [PMID: 41184211 · 2026]
Houlberg MNA, N&#xf8;rreslet LB, Wolff ELG, Svendsen SV, Mose KF, Mortz CG · Contact Dermatitis (2026)

Globally, 20% of children and up to 10% of adults have atopic dermatitis (AD). The impaired skin barrier function among AD patients may predispose them to a higher risk of contact allergy. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of contact allergy to preservatives and emulsifiers in AD patients compared with other dermatological patients (non-AD) patch tested in the period 2006-2023, as well as assess clinical relevance. A retrospective analysis of patch test data was performed among 7936 patients consecutively patch tested with preservatives and emulsifiers in the baseline series at the Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Overall, no association between AD and contact allergy to preservatives was found. However, significantly more AD patients compared to non-AD patients had contact allergy to 2-Bromo-2-Nitropropane-1,3-Diol (1.8% versus 0.6%) and the emulsifier decyl glucoside (14.3% versus 3.1%). Non-AD patients had significantly more contact allergy to benzisothiazolinone (15.4%) compared to AD patients (8.1%). This study showed no overall association between AD and a higher risk of developing contact allergy to preservatives, although differences were identified for a few individual preservatives and for decyl glucoside.

Application of Alkyl Polyglucosides as Components of the Extraction Medium in the Preparation of a Shampoo Cosmetic Formulation Containing Substances Isolated from Red Grape Pomace [PMID: 41011709 · 2025]
Wasilewski T, Hordyjewicz-Baran Z, Sabura E, Malorna K, Dresler E, Zegarski M, Stanek-Wandzel N · Molecules (2025)

This study highlights the use of alkyl polyglucosides (APGs) as sustainable and mild surfactants in cosmetic preparations, such as shampoos, following the principles of green chemistry and environmentally friendly development. APGs are non-ionic surfactants of plant origin. Their favorable dermatological and toxicological profile, as well as their high skin compatibility, make them an excellent alternative to conventional surfactants used in cosmetic products. To increase the sustainability and functionality of cosmetic preparations, the concept of loan extraction was applied, in which the extraction medium is borrowed from the final cosmetic formulation. After the extraction process, the medium enriched with the extracted compounds is returned to the cosmetic. The APGs, as part of cosmetic formulations, were used in the micellar extraction process of grape pomace, a by-product of wine production. The study evaluated the effect of different types of APGs-coco-glucoside and decyl glucoside-and their concentrations on extraction efficiency, measured by LC-MS/MS based on the content of phenolic compounds and amino acids, as well as the total phenolic content, total anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity assessed by UV-Vis spectroscopy. The designed extraction medium was then used to develop a shampoo, which showed a significantly lower zein value compared to the reference preparation without extract, indicating a reduced skin irritation potential. These results highlight the potential of APG in the development of milder, sustainable cosmetic products with the ability to extract bioactive components, supporting their use in the production of environmentally friendly cosmetics.

Frequent Positive Patch Test Reactions to Glucosides in Children: A Call for Caution? [PMID: 40394829 · 2025]
Kanokrungsee S, Leysen J, Aerts O, Dendooven E · Contact Dermatitis (2025)

Alkyl glucosides are surfactants commonly found in cosmetics and household products. However, data on glucoside contact allergy in paediatric populations is limited. To determine the prevalence, relevance and clinical characteristics of contact allergy to glucosides in children. A retrospective review of the files of paediatric patients (&#x2264;&#x2009;16&#x2009;years) who underwent patch testing for decyl glucoside (DG) and/or lauryl glucoside (LG) at the Antwerp University Hospital (UZA) in the period between January 2018 and December 2024. Among 241 children tested for DG, 148 (61.4%) were also tested for LG. DG reactions were observed in 47 patients (19.5%), with 27 (11.2%) considered positive. LG reactions occurred in 17/148 (13%), but only 4 (2.7%) were positive, all with concomitant DG reactions. Most positive DG reactions were weak (+) (25/27), whereas only 2 were strong (++). The median age was 7&#x2009;years (range: 2-15), with 51.9% female. Culprit sources mostly included cosmetics. Patch test reactions to glucosides readily occur in children, and the positivity rate is surprisingly high. Besides many irritant and doubtful reactions, false-positive (+) reactions likely occur, particularly in young atopic children. Careful interpretation of positive results and complementary work-up may thus be necessary.

Use of sorbitan sesquioleate in patch test preparations and patch testing with the substance-What do our results mean? [PMID: 36305668 · 2023]
Sukakul T, Bruze M, Mowitz M, Svedman C · Contact Dermatitis (2023)

Sorbitan sesquioleate (SSO) is a sorbitan fatty acid ester, an emulsifier used in topical products and certain patch test preparations. SSO may affect the patch test results. It has been debated whether to include the substance in the baseline series to avoid misinterpretation of the results. To report the prevalence and simultaneous reactions of SSO with other patch test preparations containing SSO as an emulsifier. A retrospective analysis of 3539 dermatitis patients who underwent patch testing from 2016 to 2020 was performed. The 5-year SSO contact allergy prevalence was 0.48%, and 1.3% had a doubtful reaction. Patients with a stronger positive reaction (2+, 3+) were more likely to react simultaneously to other allergen preparations containing SSO (p value&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.018). One patient with a strong reaction to SSO reacted positively to all SSO-containing patch test preparations. Definite fragrance allergens could not be identified in the patients who had simultaneous reactions to SSO and fragrance mix (FM) I. Patch testing with allergen preparations containing SSO affected the patch test interpretation. Fragrance contact allergy could not be ruled out when a patient simultaneously reacted to SSO and FM I. Changing emulsifiers in patch test preparations would be advantageous.

Co-reactivity of glucosides: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data 2019-2020 [PMID: 36268749 · 2023]
Warshaw EM, Xiong M, DeKoven JG, Taylor JS, Belsito DV, Reeder MJ, Adler BL, Pratt MD, Atwater AR, Maibach HI, Silverberg JI, Yu J, Botto N, Fowler JF, Houle MC, Mowad CM, Dunnick CA, DeLeo VA · Contact Dermatitis (2023)
Patch testing with glucosides: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group experience, 2009-2018 [PMID: 35551968 · 2022]
Warshaw EM, Xiong M, Atwater AR, DeKoven JG, Pratt MD, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Belsito DV, Silverberg JI, Reeder MJ, Zug KA, Sasseville D, Fowler JF, DeLeo VA, Houle MC, Dunnick CA · J Am Acad Dermatol (2022)

Alkyl glucosides are nonionic surfactants that are increasingly used in personal care products. To characterize positive patch test reactions to decyl glucoside (5% petrolatum, tested 2009-2018) and lauryl glucoside (3% petrolatum, tested 2017-2018). Retrospective analysis of patients tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Of 24,097 patients patch tested to decyl and/or lauryl glucoside, 470 (2.0%) had positive reactions. Compared with glucoside-negative patients, glucoside-positive patients had higher odds of occupational skin disease (13.4% vs 10.1%; P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.0207), history of hay fever (38.5% vs 31.6%; P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.0014), atopic dermatitis (39.0% vs 28.6%; P&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;.0001), and/or asthma (21.8% vs 16.5%; P&#xa0;=&#xa0;.0023). Most glucoside reactions (83.9%) were currently relevant. The most common source was personal care products (63.0%), especially hair products (16.5%) and skin cleansers (15.2%). Of 4933 patients tested to decyl and lauryl glucoside, 134 (2.7%) were positive to 1 or both; 43.4% (43 of 99) of decyl-positive patients were also positive to lauryl glucoside and 55.1% (43/78) of lauryl glucoside patients were also positive to decyl glucoside. The cohort predominantly reflects a referral population, and follow-up after testing was not captured. Glucoside positivity occurred in 2.0% of the tested patients. Reactions were often clinically relevant and linked to personal care products. Cross-reactivity was &gt;40%.

European patch test results with audit allergens as candidates for inclusion in the European Baseline Series, 2019/20: Joint results of the ESSCA(A) and the EBS(B) working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC(C) [PMID: 35099073 · 2022]
Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, Bauer A, Borrego L, Buhl T, Cooper SM, Dickel H, Gallo R, Gim&#xe9;nez-Arnau AM, John SM, Navarini AA, Pesonen M, P&#xf3;nyai G, Rustemeyer T, Schliemann S, Schubert S, Schuttelaar MA, Valiukevi&#x10d;ien&#x117; S, Wagner N, Weisshaar E, Gon&#xe7;alo M, ESSCA and EBS ESCD working groups, and the GEIDAC · Contact Dermatitis (2022)

In 2019, a number of allergens (haptens), henceforth, "the audit allergens," were considered as potential additions to the European Baseline Series (EBS), namely, sodium metabisulfite, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, Compositae mix II (2.5% or 5% pet), linalool hydroperoxides (lin-OOH), limonene hydroperoxides (lim-OOH), benzisothiazolinone (BIT), octylisothiazolinone (OIT), decyl glucoside, and lauryl glucoside; Evernia furfuracea (tree moss), was additionally tested by some departments as well. To collect further data on patch test reactivity and clinical relevance of the audit allergens in consecutive patients across Europe. Patch test data covering the audit allergens in 2019 and 2020 were collected by those departments of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies testing these, as well as further collaborators from the EBS working group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD), and the Spanish Grupo Espa&#xf1;ol de Investigaci&#xf3;n en Dermatitis de Contacto y Alergia Cut&#xe1;nea. As patch test outcome, reactions between day (D) 3 and D5 were considered. Altogether n&#xa0;=&#x2009;12&#x2009;403 patients were tested with any of the audit allergen. Positive reactions were most common to lin-OOH 1% pet. (8.74% [95%CI: 8.14-9.37%]), followed by lin-OOH 0.5% pet., and lim-OOH 0.3% pet (5.41% [95% CI: 4.95-5.89%]). Beyond these terpene hydroperoxides, BIT 0.1% pet. was the second most common allergen with 4.72% (95% CI: 4.2-5.28%), followed by sodium metabisulfite 1% pet. (3.75% [95%CI: 3.32-4.23%]) and Compositae mix 5% pet. (2.31% [95% CI: 1.84-2.87%]). For some allergens, clinical relevance was frequently difficult to ascertain. Despite many positive patch test reactions, it remains controversial whether lin- and lim-OOH should be tested routinely, while at least the two preservatives BIT and sodium metabisulfite appear suitable. The present results are a basis for further discussion and ultimately decision on their implementation into routine testing among the ESCD members.

The History of Surfactants and Review of Their Allergic and Irritant Properties [PMID: 34524773 · 2021]
Presley CL, Militello M, Barber C, Ladd R, Laughter M, Ferguson H, Dewey J, Pulsipher KJ, Rundle CW, Dunnick CA · Dermatitis (2021)

Surfactants, many of which are used as detergents, can be found in many common household items, such as shampoos, conditioners, soaps, and cosmetics. One should recognize the multitude of surfactants that are used in today's products to identify any potential allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) or irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). Given their abundance in everyday products, it is understandable that many cases of occupational contact dermatitis that arise can be attributed to surfactants. The products most connected with ACD are cocamidopropyl betaine, oleamidopropyl dimethylamine, decyl glucoside, 3-dimethylaminopropylamine, amidoamine, and cocamide diethanolamine. Similarly, the most common surfactant-related causes of ICD are sodium lauryl sulfate and benzalkonium chloride. It is important for dermatologists to identify the causes and differentiate between the two, to adjust treatments and products accordingly. Here, the most frequently used surfactants, as well as their correlation between ACD and ICD, will be reviewed.

Extracts from By-Products of the Fruit and Vegetable Industry as Ingredients Improving the Properties of Cleansing Gels [PMID: 41471714 · 2025]
Blicharz-Kania A, Iwanek M, Pecyna A · Molecules (2025)

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding extracts obtained from by-products on the physicochemical and functional properties of cleansing gels. Micellar extraction (2% decyl glucoside solution in water) was performed on secondary raw materials: banana peel (BP), pomegranate peel (PP), tomato pomace (TP), and grape pomace (GP). The extracts were analyzed for soluble substances and active compounds (polyphenols, carotenoids, and vitamin C). Cleansing gels containing plant extracts were also prepared and evaluated for their color and physicochemical and functional properties. The extracts contained natural polyphenols (10.99-16.54 mg&#xb7;100 mL -1 ), carotenoids (1.391-2.402 mg&#xb7;mL -1 ), and vitamin C (0.651-1.529 mg&#xb7;100 mL -1 ). The extract-enriched gels showed altered color (lower brightness, greater redness and yellowness), enhanced foaming properties, and modified viscosity (402.9-416.8 mPA for BP and GP; lower for PP and TP). The pH of the gels ranged from 5.391 to 5.917, which is within the physiological range of human skin. Dissolution times were reduced by up to 60% compared to the control, with PP extract producing the shortest time of 15.7 min. These results indicate that plant by-product extracts can improve both the functional performance and skin compatibility of cleaning gels.

자주 묻는 질문 (AEO 스니펫 최적화 FAQ)

Q1. 데실글루코사이드 (DECYL GLUCOSIDE)의 국가별 공식 전성분 표기명은 어떻게 다른가요?
한국 식약처 표준명은 '데실글루코사이드', 미국 PCPC 및 유럽 CosIng INCI 표기는 'DECYL GLUCOSIDE', 중국 NMPA IECIC 표준명은 '癸基葡糖苷', 일본 화장품 표시명칭은 'DECYL GLUCOSIDE'입니다.
Q2. 데실글루코사이드의 글로벌 6대 권역 법정 배합 한도(Layer 1)는 무엇인가요?
한국(KR: none), 유럽(EU: none), 미국(US: none), 중국(CN: allowed), 일본(JP: none), 아세안(ASEAN: none) 고시 기준을 준수하여 처방해야 합니다.
Q3. 제형 설계 시 데실글루코사이드의 통상 배합 농도(Layer 3)와 적정 pH는 얼마인가요?
대표 제형군(aqueous_serum) 기준 통상 0.1~0.2%(권장 중앙값 0.1%) 범위로 투입하며, 적정 pH는 4~8입니다.
Q4. 데실글루코사이드 배합 시 주의해야 할 상용성 금기(Incompatibilities)와 시너지 성분은 무엇인가요?
주요 권장 시너지 조합은 GLYCERIN, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, TOCOPHEROL이며, 배합 주의사항은 처방 내 극단적 pH 조건 및 고농도 전해질과의 상용성 사전 확인 권장입니다.